Blog

<h2>Introduction to Digital Learning Rights</h2>
In today's rapidly evolving educational landscape, understanding digital learning rights is crucial for both parents and educators. In Texas, as schools increasingly integrate technology into the classroom, it's important to be informed about the rights and responsibilities associated with digital learning. This knowledge empowers parents and educators to make informed decisions that benefit students' educational experiences.

Digital learning encompasses a wide range of tools and platforms, from online textbooks to virtual classrooms. With these advancements come important considerations regarding privacy, accessibility, and equitable access to technology. Recognizing and understanding these rights ensures that all students have the opportunity to succeed in a digital learning environment.

<figure id="figure-100y8212wsmeqp1xiz"><img id="100y8212wsmeqp1xiz" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/2170979793/photo/aerial-view-of-a-large-public-university-in-dallas-texas.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=mncUbeTrsBP0x5PHnDr5rz_4LUzVpyNiUw75unwFhnU=" alt="texas education" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h2>The Importance of Privacy and Data Protection</h2>
One of the primary concerns in digital learning is the protection of student data. In Texas, schools are required to comply with state and federal regulations that safeguard student information. These regulations ensure that personal data is collected, stored, and used responsibly. Parents should be aware of how their child's information is being handled and have the right to request access to this data.

For educators, understanding these privacy guidelines is essential in maintaining trust with students and parents. Teachers must ensure that the platforms and tools they use adhere to privacy standards, thus protecting students' personal information from unauthorized access.

<h3>Key Privacy Regulations</h3>
Some of the key regulations include:
<ul>
 <li>COPPA (Children's Online Privacy Protection Act) - Protects the privacy of children under 13 by requiring parental consent for data collection.</li>
 <li>FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) - Gives parents the right to access their children's educational records and limits the sharing of this information.</li>
</ul>

<figure id="figure-ga79mqwey3meqp1xiz"><img id="ga79mqwey3meqp1xiz" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/2200974300/photo/digital-security-concept-lock-icon-on-modern-futuristic-technology-background-3d-rendering.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=W6uOxjMAXK8C9AgFwzFsqMedOJ3HZrQhZzyut2ejht8=" alt="data privacy" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h2>Ensuring Accessibility and Equity in Digital Learning</h2>
Accessibility is another critical component of digital learning rights in Texas. Schools are tasked with providing equitable access to technology for all students, regardless of their socio-economic status. This includes offering devices like tablets or laptops for students who might not have them at home and ensuring that online resources are accessible to students with disabilities.

Educators play a vital role in this process by selecting and implementing tools that accommodate diverse learning needs. This might involve using software that offers text-to-speech capabilities or ensuring that resources are available in multiple languages.

<h3>Addressing the Digital Divide</h3>
The "digital divide" refers to the gap between those who have easy access to digital resources and those who do not. In Texas, initiatives are underway to close this gap by enhancing infrastructure in underserved areas and providing necessary resources to students in need.

<figure id="figure-cc502j0iyomeqp1xiz"><img id="cc502j0iyomeqp1xiz" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/2194166576/photo/three-accessibility-icon-on-computer-keyboard.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=9n9_JRUZJyKkmwXil9NGWcmcNwvPh__8S9gt-7dTBV0=" alt="accessibility technology" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h2>The Role of Parents in Digital Learning</h2>
Parents are encouraged to be actively involved in their children's digital learning experiences. This involvement includes understanding the platforms being used, monitoring their child's online activities, and communicating with educators about any concerns or questions regarding digital learning rights.

By staying informed, parents can better advocate for their children's needs and collaborate with schools to create a safe and effective learning environment. Open communication between parents and educators is key to addressing any issues that may arise and ensuring that students receive the support they need.

<figure id="figure-sro1hpxlfomeqp1xiz"><img id="sro1hpxlfomeqp1xiz" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/2228806310/photo/teacher-and-parents-discussing-academic-failure-of-primary-school-student-in-classroom.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=xKZFX21eSLayAydowKW1DZMh_xctrE2VTyH17dRUzTY=" alt="parent teacher meeting" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>
Understanding digital learning rights in Texas is essential for creating a supportive and secure educational environment for students. By recognizing the importance of privacy, accessibility, and parental involvement, parents and educators can work together to enhance the digital learning experience. As technology continues to evolve, staying informed about these rights will ensure that all students have the opportunity to thrive in a digital world.

Understanding Digital Learning Rights in Texas: What Parents and Educators Need to Know

<h2>The Importance of Public Education Advocacy</h2>
Public education is often described as the backbone of society, providing the foundation for a well-informed and skilled populace. Yet, the importance of advocating for public education is sometimes underestimated. Experts emphasize that advocacy is crucial to ensure that education systems remain accessible, equitable, and effective for all students. Without continuous support and improvement, public education can face challenges that hinder educational progress and societal growth.

<figure id="figure-sij7seijbmedu368p"><img id="sij7seijbmedu368p" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/1436137184/photo/elementary-friends-outdoors.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=KldhlVir09EAZWkZxHwKNV2kSGeKRuKj1USlDHBQnB0=" alt="public education" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h3>Addressing Inequities in Education</h3>
One of the most significant reasons public education advocacy matters is its role in addressing inequities within the system. Despite efforts to provide equal opportunities, disparities persist due to factors such as socioeconomic status, race, and geographic location. Advocates work tirelessly to highlight these gaps and push for policies that promote fairness and inclusivity. By doing so, they help ensure that all students, regardless of their background, have access to quality education.

Experts suggest that advocacy can lead to tangible changes that benefit marginalized communities. For instance, initiatives focused on increasing funding for underserved schools or implementing programs that support students with disabilities are often the result of persistent advocacy efforts. Such changes are essential for creating a more equitable education landscape.

<h3>Ensuring Accountability and Transparency</h3>
Advocacy also plays a critical role in promoting accountability and transparency within public education systems. Stakeholders, including parents, educators, and community members, rely on advocates to hold policymakers accountable for their decisions. This includes ensuring that funds are allocated appropriately and that educational standards are met.

<figure id="figure-je3z2sk739medu368p"><img id="je3z2sk739medu368p" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/1622595767/photo/artificial-intelligence-concept.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=qpKqHAHV5qfK09VjRG4ebqeMCHqZmg2sWNLeZ8qn_v8=" alt="education policy" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

Transparency in decision-making processes is vital for maintaining trust between the public and educational institutions. Advocates often push for clear communication from school boards and government officials, ensuring that the interests of students and communities are prioritized.

<h3>Fostering Innovation and Adaptation</h3>
In a rapidly changing world, public education systems must be adaptable and open to innovation. Advocacy can drive this change by encouraging the adoption of new teaching methods, technologies, and curricula that better prepare students for future challenges. Experts believe that when advocates push for such innovations, they help create an education system that is more relevant and responsive to the needs of today's learners.

Furthermore, advocacy efforts can highlight the importance of professional development for educators, ensuring they have the tools and knowledge necessary to implement innovative practices effectively.

<figure id="figure-q9d1m0fxsgmedu368p"><img id="q9d1m0fxsgmedu368p" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/2212860038/photo/innovative-learning-concepts-featuring-robotic-arm-and-digital-education-icons-representing.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=nwfMxoko04fiMRdpGUQo7b08B0IU47u1wnNTQoUue4g=" alt="innovative education" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h3>Building Community Support</h3>
Public education advocacy is not only about influencing policy but also about building strong community support for schools. When communities rally behind their local schools, they can provide resources, volunteer time, and foster an environment that values education. Experts agree that such community involvement is crucial for student success and overall school improvement.

Advocacy groups often organize events, workshops, and campaigns to engage community members and encourage them to take an active role in supporting their schools. This collective effort strengthens the bond between schools and their communities, creating a positive impact on students' educational experiences.

<h2>The Future of Public Education Advocacy</h2>
The future of public education relies heavily on continuous advocacy efforts. As societal needs evolve, so too must our education systems. By supporting public education advocacy, individuals can contribute to a brighter future where all students have the opportunity to succeed. Experts remind us that advocacy is not just a one-time effort but an ongoing commitment to improving education for generations to come.

Why Public Education Advocacy Matters: Insights from Experts

Closeup image of chalkboard with text DO WHAT IS RIGHT, NOT WHAT IS EASY and compass.

<h3>Why the KISD Board Must Waive Privilege: Transparency Is a Fiduciary Duty, Not a Liability</h3>By Andrew D. Sternke, J.D. Executive Director, Texas Public Education Defense Fund (TPEDF) In recent months, the Keller ISD Board of Trustees has been involved in controversy over alleged secret discussions and legal expenditures tied to plans to split the district. As community members, parents, and taxpayers demand answers, some trustees have argued that attorney-client privilege and fiduciary responsibilities prevent the release of legal documents and invoices related to these discussions.Let me be clear: that argument is legally inaccurate and ethically troubling. The Board has the legal authority to waive privilege in this matter and has a moral and fiduciary obligation to do so. What Is Legal Privilege And Who Really Owns It?In Texas, attorney-client privilege is governed by Texas Rule of Evidence 503. This rule protects confidential communications between clients and their legal counsel to facilitate legal advice.However, in the context of public entities like Keller ISD, the "client" is not an individual trustee. The Board holds the legal privilege as a collective governmental body, as clarified by Open Records Decision No. ORD‑676 (2002) from the Texas Attorney General. No single board member has the power to assert or waive privilege on their own. Only the Board, through a formal vote, can decide to waive privilege.Additionally, Texas Rule of Evidence 511 clarifies that privilege can be voluntarily waived, either explicitly (by vote) or implicitly (through disclosure).In other words, trustees who claim they are individually bound by privilege are either misinformed or deliberately misleading the public. The Board, as the legal entity, holds the privilege and can waive it through a public vote, which is consistent with Texas law. Fiduciary Duty Requires Openness, Not ObstructionSome trustees have pointed to their fiduciary duty as a reason to maintain secrecy. However, that reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of what fiduciary duty means in public service.Under Texas law, trustees have a duty of loyalty, care, and obedience to the law and the public. They do not serve their own interests, political alliances, or outside legal strategies. They serve the taxpayers and students of Keller ISD.When legal services are paid for with public dollars, especially concerning controversial topics like district secession, fiduciary duty demands oversight, not opacity. Voters have the right to know:<ul><li>What legal advice was sought and why?</li><li>Who authorized it?</li><li>How much of their tax money was spent?</li></ul>As the Texas Supreme Court affirmed in Paxton v. City of Dallas, 509 S.W.3d 247 (Tex. 2017), attorney-client privilege is especially important in government. Still, the environmental body retains full authority to waive it when appropriate. The Court emphasized that public entities must balance legal confidentiality with the principles of open government. The Path to Waive Privilege: Step-by-StepThe KISD Board of Trustees can waive attorney-client privilege fully within the bounds of Texas law. Here’s an example:1. Post the Item on the Meeting AgendaInclude a properly worded agenda item such as:“Discussion and possible action to waive attorney-client privilege and release all legal communications, memos, and invoices related to district split discussions occurring between May 2024 and the present.”2. Review Privileged Documents in Executive Session (Optional)Under the Texas Open Meetings Act (TOMA), the Board may review these materials confidentially before taking action.3. Vote in Open SessionThe waiver must be approved by a majority of the Board in a public vote. This action is lawful and aligns with Texas Government Code § 552.107(1), which allows, but does not require, exempting privileged materials from disclosure under the Texas Public Information Act.4. Direct Counsel to Disclose MaterialsThe Board may instruct its legal counsel to release specific communications, emails, invoices, or memoranda, particularly those tied to the use of public funds. According to Texas Government Code § 552.022(a)(16), attorney billing records are generally public unless a valid claim of privilege is actively maintained. The Law Encourages TransparencyThe Texas Attorney General’s Office has consistently upheld that the attorney-client privilege in government is discretionary, not mandatory. In ORD‑676 (2002), the AG concluded that a governmental body may voluntarily waive privilege to release otherwise exempt documents, supporting the principles of open government.The Texas Public Information Act reinforces that precedent, favoring transparency and limiting exceptions to disclosure. Privilege can be claimed, but just as importantly, it can be waived when the public interest demands it. The Public Interest Demands ActionThis isn’t about politics. It’s about public transparency and accountability. Keller ISD stakeholders deserve honest answers:<ul><li>Who initiated plans to split the district?</li><li>What advice did the Board receive?</li><li>How much taxpayer money was spent, without public approval or awareness?</li><li>Was the Texas Open Meetings Act (TOMA) violated?</li></ul>If nothing improper occurred, transparency will clear the air. If there was misconduct, transparency is the first step toward accountability. Continuing to hide behind privilege only deepens public mistrust. Real Leadership Means Choosing the Public Over PoliticsThis is a defining moment for the KISD Board. Trustees must choose whether to protect the people or themselves.By voting to waive privilege and disclose these documents, the Board would demonstrate a commitment to honest governance, fiduciary integrity, and lawful transparency, the very principles they swore to uphold.The truth should never be treated as a liability in public education and public service. Disclaimer:The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice regarding specific legal matters or rights, readers should consult with a qualified attorney licensed in their jurisdiction.

Why the KISD Board Must Waive Privilege: Transparency Is a Fiduciary Duty, Not a Liability

Handcuffs, gavel on book on a wooden background.

<h3>Keller ISD Trustees Must Be Held Criminally Accountable for Texas Open Meetings Act Violations</h3>By Texas Public Education Defense Fund (TPEDF) The public trust has been broken in Keller Independent School District, not by accident, but through several elected school board members' deliberate pattern of deception and secrecy. Based on the mounting evidence revealed in legal filings and investigative reporting, TPEDF is calling on the Tarrant County District Attorneys Office to criminally prosecute Keller ISD trustees Charles Randklev, John Birt, Heather Washington, and former Trustee Micah Young for their blatant violations of the Texas Open Meetings Act (TOMA). What Did They Do?According to a new lawsuit filed in Tarrant County on July 31, 2025, these trustees engaged in secret planning sessions as early as May 2024, months before any public acknowledgment, aiming to split Keller ISD into separate entities. Their actions included:- Holding private meetings outside of public view to strategize on the split.- Discussing official business via personal emails, secured message apps, and off-site meetings that were never posted or announced to the public.- Coordinating closed-door sessions involving financial consultants and legal advisors while falsely claiming that such discussions didn’t begin until December 19, 2024.- Making key decisions as a quorum, the legal threshold for board deliberations, without public notice, which is a criminal offense under TOMA.These actions didn’t just violate board policy; they are breaking the law. What Is the Texas Open Meetings Act?The Texas Open Meetings Act (TOMA) exists to protect democracy at the local level. It ensures that when government officials, including school board members, make decisions about our tax dollars, schools, and children, they do so transparently, with proper notice, and in open public meetings.TOMA prohibits trustees from meeting in private (or serially in small groups, aka a “walking quorum”) to discuss public matters that are supposed to be addressed in public. These laws are not optional. Violating TOMA is a Class B misdemeanor in Texas and can result in fines, removal from office, and jail time. Why It MattersRandklev, Birt, Washington, and Young's actions weren’t just procedural missteps; they were part of a calculated, covert effort to bypass public input on the most radical proposal in Keller ISD history: a complete district split.This wasn’t about improving education. It was about political maneuvering behind closed doors, using taxpayer money to push a hidden agenda. It’s reported that over $264,000 in taxpayer funds were funneled to legal and consulting firms, some wholly involved in crafting this secret plan.This kind of behavior is precisely what TOMA was written to prevent. The Case for Criminal ProsecutionTPEDF stands firm in our belief that civil accountability via lawsuits is not enough. If these trustees are not held criminally responsible for their actions, it sends a dangerous message: that elected officials can manipulate public power in the dark without consequence.We urge the Tarrant County District Attorneys Office to:- Open a criminal investigation into all four trustees involved in the secret planning and quorum-based discussions.- Pursue charges under Texas Government Code Chapter 551, which prohibits secret deliberations and imposes criminal penalties for violations.This will send a clear message that the people of Tarrant County and all Texans expect transparency, accountability, and lawful conduct from their elected leaders. Public Education Deserves BetterAt a time when public schools are under attack from political extremists, the last thing we need is rogue trustees behaving like backroom power brokers. Keller ISD students, parents, teachers, and taxpayers deserve leaders who work in the light of day, not in secret.The Texas Public Education Defense Fund (TPEDF) will continue to monitor this case closely and support all legal efforts to ensure justice is served for the community and the integrity of Texas public education. Join Us. Defend Public Education. Demand Accountability and Transparency.

Keller ISD Trustees Must Be Held Criminally Accountable for Texas Open Meetings Act Violations

Texas Public Education Defense Fund (TPEDF)FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEAugust 2, 2025Contact: press@tpedf.orgWebsite: <a href="http://www.tpedf.org" data-mce-href="http://www.tpedf.org">www.tpedf.org</a> <h3>TPEDF Denounces Defamation by The Dallas Express and Threat of Violence Against Volunteer Legal Director</h3>Colleyville, TX — The Texas Public Education Defense Fund (TPEDF) is publicly denouncing a defamatory article published by The Dallas Express on August 1, 2025. The article made demonstrably false and malicious claims about the organization and its volunteer senior legal director, Rachel Elizabeth Wall.The article falsely labeled TPEDF as a “radical-left PAC,” grossly mischaracterized its nonprofit legal advocacy work, and accused Ms. Wall of financial harm and harassment claims that are entirely without factual basis. This reckless publication constitutes a direct act of defamation that has now escalated into a matter of public endangerment.Since the article’s release, TPEDF has identified a violent social media threat directed at Ms. Wall, which references her by name and calls for her to be lynched. The comment, clearly incited by the article’s inflammatory language, is both chilling and unacceptable.“This is not just defamation, it’s character assassination that has put a member of our legal team in real danger,” said Andrew D. Sternke, Executive Director of TPEDF. “When media outlets publish lies and vilify public advocates to advance political agendas, they incite violence. That’s exactly what has happened here.”Rachel Wall is a licensed Texas attorney and respected legal advocate who has worked tirelessly to hold public institutions accountable through lawful and transparent means. For her to now face targeted threats of violence underscores the real-world consequences of weaponized disinformation.“We condemn this attack, and call it what it is, dangerous, defamatory, and malicious,” Sternke continued. “Those who believe they can silence us through lies or intimidation are mistaken. TPEDF will continue to stand firmly defending public education and democratic values.”TPEDF calls on responsible members of the press, elected leaders, and the broader public to condemn threats of violence and hold media outlets accountable when their publications spread disinformation and put lives at risk. About TPEDFThe Texas Public Education Defense Fund is a nonpartisan 501(c)(4) legal advocacy organization committed to defending public education, advancing equity, and holding public officials accountable under the law. To learn more, visit <a href="http://www.tpedf.org" data-mce-href="http://www.tpedf.org">www.tpedf.org</a>

TPEDF Denounces Defamation by The Dallas Express and Threat of Violence Against Volunteer Legal Director

Newsletter Blog News Website Update Announcement

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEJuly 21, 2025Contact:Texas Public Education Defense Fundpress@tpedf.org | www.tpedf.org<figure id="figure-hmpksdrtjvmddkrkhy"><img id="hmpksdrtjvmddkrkhy" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/485852674/photo/equality-balance-discrimination-equal-moral-concept.jpg?b=1&amp;s=2048x2048&amp;w=0&amp;k=20&amp;c=UVxmwPVLO2IEw6c5PzokPT9VNpjno3JU7SRTnQzafgg=" alt="Equality Balance Discrimination Equal Moral Concept" title="Equality Balance Discrimination Equal Moral Concept" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="undefined" data-positiony="undefined" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/485852674/photo/equality-balance-discrimination-equal-moral-concept.jpg?b=1&amp;s=2048x2048&amp;w=0&amp;k=20&amp;c=UVxmwPVLO2IEw6c5PzokPT9VNpjno3JU7SRTnQzafgg=" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;"></figure><h3>TPEDF Files Level One Grievance Against GCISD Over Budget Decisions Impacting Title I Campuses</h3>Colleyville, TX — On July 21, 2025, the Texas Public Education Defense Fund (TPEDF) submitted a formal Community Level One Grievance with Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District (GCISD), objecting to recent decisions made by the GCISD Board of Trustees during its June 16, 2025, budget adoption.The grievance challenges the District’s official position formally adopted with the budget, which includes: - Continuing to increase out-of-district student transfers, a policy that threatens the district’s eligibility for federal Title I funding allocated for economically disadvantaged students;- Eliminating vital intervention positions at Title I campuses that were previously funded through federal Title grants; and- Reassigning and altering the roles of Gifted and Talented (GT) Specialists exclusively at Title I campuses. These actions were taken despite a June 23, 2025, letter submitted to the GCISD Board signed by more than 140 concerned district families urging the Board to reverse the cuts to GT positions at Title I schools. The letter, representing a broad cross-section of the GCISD community, was effectively ignored. The Board proceeded without meaningful response or consideration of the community’s concerns, prompting this formal grievance filing.“These decisions disproportionately impact GCISD's most vulnerable student populations,” said Andrew Sternke, Executive Director of TPEDF. “It is unacceptable for the district to continue expanding policies that undermine support for economically disadvantaged children, all while stripping away targeted interventions and programs at the campuses that need them most.”TPEDF's grievance asserts that these budgetary actions demonstrate a troubling pattern of inequity and neglect, potentially violating the district's own equity policy and federal compliance policies. The organization urges GCISD to reconsider these harmful decisions and restore support to Title I campuses.If GCISD does not address these concerns through its grievance process, TPEDF is prepared to take further action, including formal complaints to the Texas Education Agency and U.S. Department of Education, and, if necessary, litigation. About TPEDF:The Texas Public Education Defense Fund is a nonprofit legal advocacy organization committed to defending public education, ensuring equitable funding, and holding school districts accountable to the communities they serve.

News

Understanding Digital Learning Rights in Texas: What Pare...

Why Public Education Advocacy Matters: Insights from Experts

Why the KISD Board Must Waive Privilege: Transparency Is ...

Keller ISD Trustees Must Be Held Criminally Accountable f...

TPEDF Denounces Defamation by The Dallas Express and Thre...

TPEDF Files Level One Grievance Against GCISD Over Budget...